Loading SOVA...
Loading SOVA...
Discover, inventory, and assess every cryptographic asset in your software supply chain. From AES keys in source code to SSL/TLS certificates on live endpoints — SOVA maps your entire cryptographic posture and flags what needs attention before quantum computing renders it obsolete.
The Problem
NIST has finalized post-quantum cryptography standards. Organizations that don't inventory their cryptographic assets now will face a costly, chaotic migration later.
2030
Predicted quantum threat timeline
Experts predict cryptographically relevant quantum computers by 2030. 'Harvest now, decrypt later' attacks are already happening — your encrypted data today may be readable tomorrow.
0%
Of orgs with complete crypto inventory
Nearly zero organizations have a complete inventory of where and how they use cryptographic algorithms. You can't migrate what you can't find.
73%
Still using deprecated algorithms
A significant percentage of applications still use deprecated crypto like SHA-1, DES, or RSA-1024. These are exploitable today, not just in the quantum future.
Real-World Incident Analysis
highAttack Timeline
2005
discovery
Theoretical weaknesses
Academic papers describe SHA-1 vulnerabilities
2011
disclosure
NIST deprecates SHA-1
Formal deprecation for digital signatures
Feb 23, 2017
exploit
First practical collision
Google/CWI demonstrate SHAttered attack
2017-2020
impact
Slow migration
Git, browsers, CAs gradually move away from SHA-1
2020
patch
Cost drops to $45K
Chosen-prefix collision now affordable for attackers
2005
Theoretical weaknesses
Academic papers describe SHA-1 vulnerabilities
2011
NIST deprecates SHA-1
Formal deprecation for digital signatures
Feb 23, 2017
First practical collision
Google/CWI demonstrate SHAttered attack
2017-2020
Slow migration
Git, browsers, CAs gradually move away from SHA-1
2020
Cost drops to $45K
Chosen-prefix collision now affordable for attackers
Attack Flow
Researchers
6,500 CPU-years + 110 GPU-years of computation
SHA-1 Collision
Two different PDFs produce identical SHA-1 hash
Trust Systems
Code signing, TLS certs, Git commits compromised
Document Forgery
Trusted documents become untrustworthy
Researchers
6,500 CPU-years + 110 GPU-years of computation
SHA-1 Collision
Two different PDFs produce identical SHA-1 hash
Trust Systems
Code signing, TLS certs, Git commits compromised
Document Forgery
Trusted documents become untrustworthy
Vulnerable Code
1import hashlib23def sign_document(document_bytes, private_key):4# VULNERABLE: SHA-1 is collision-prone5digest = hashlib.sha1(document_bytes).hexdigest()6signature = private_key.sign(digest)7return signature89# SECURE: Use SHA-256 or SHA-310def sign_document_secure(document_bytes, private_key):11digest = hashlib.sha3_256(document_bytes).hexdigest()12signature = private_key.sign(digest)13return signature
What Happened
SHA-1 collisions mean two different documents can produce the same hash. An attacker can create a malicious document that has the same SHA-1 signature as a legitimate one, bypassing integrity checks.
How SOVA Prevents This
SOVA scans actual crypto usage, not just packages — detecting algorithm calls across your codebase.
Deep Crypto Scan
Cbom_Engine scans all crypto usage — actual algorithm calls, not just package names
NIST OID Mapping
Detects hashlib.sha1() usage, maps to NIST OID 1.3.14.3.2.26
Weakness Flagging
Flags as 'Deprecated' with CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash)
Quantum Readiness
SHA-1 is quantum-vulnerable — recommends migration to SHA-3
Deep Crypto Scan
Cbom_Engine scans all crypto usage — actual algorithm calls, not just package names
NIST OID Mapping
Detects hashlib.sha1() usage, maps to NIST OID 1.3.14.3.2.26
Weakness Flagging
Flags as 'Deprecated' with CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash)
Quantum Readiness
SHA-1 is quantum-vulnerable — recommends migration to SHA-3
How It Works
Scan Sources
Algorithm Detection
NIST OID Mapping
2.16.840.1.101.3.4.1.46 → AES-256-GCM → Approved
Quantum Readiness
Migration Recommendations
RSA-2048 → ML-KEM-768
SHA-1 → SHA-3
SOVA identifies every cryptographic algorithm in use across your codebase, containers, and infrastructure. Each is classified by status and compliance readiness.
Industry standard. NIST FIPS 197. Recommended for classified data.
NIST approved. Sufficient for most commercial applications.
Minimum acceptable key size. Quantum-vulnerable. Plan migration.
Factoring attacks feasible. Must upgrade to 2048+ immediately.
Standard hash for signatures, certificates, integrity checks.
Collision attacks proven (SHAttered, 2017). Remove from all usage.
Trivially broken. Collision in seconds. Never use for security.
Higher security margin. Preferred for long-term integrity.
AEAD cipher. TLS 1.3 standard. Fast without hardware AES.
Deprecated by NIST 2023. Sweet32 attack. Replace with AES.
64-bit block size vulnerable to birthday attacks. Use AES.
EdDSA signature. Fast, deterministic. Used in SSH and JWT.
Five distinct source types are analyzed to build a comprehensive cryptographic inventory. Each source reveals different aspects of your encryption posture.
Scanned 13+ languages for cryptographic function calls, library imports, and algorithm references in application source code.
Layer-by-layer analysis of installed crypto libraries, shared objects, and compiled dependencies inside container images.
Certificate chain analysis including issuer, validity, key size, protocol version, and cipher suite for every configured endpoint.
Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests scanned for encryption configuration, KMS key references, and TLS settings.
Static analysis of compiled binaries for embedded crypto constants, linked libraries, and algorithm signatures without source code access.
SOVA connects to live endpoints and extracts the complete TLS configuration. Certificate chains, cipher suites, protocol versions, and key exchange parameters are all cataloged and assessed.
SOVA maps every detected algorithm against FIPS 140-2 approved lists. Instantly identify non-compliant usage in federal, financial, or healthcare environments.
Quantum computers will break RSA, ECDSA, and DH-based key exchange. SOVA identifies which algorithms in your inventory are quantum-vulnerable and maps migration paths to NIST post-quantum standards.
Broken by Shor's algorithm. All key sizes vulnerable.
Elliptic curve discrete log broken by quantum.
Discrete log problem solved by quantum computers.
Same discrete log vulnerability as DH.
Grover's algorithm halves effective key size. 256-bit remains secure (128-bit quantum).
Grover's reduces collision resistance. Still considered adequate.
NIST PQC standard (FIPS 203). Lattice-based. Ready for deployment.
NIST PQC standard (FIPS 204). Lattice-based signature scheme.
NIST PQC standard (FIPS 205). Hash-based, conservative choice.
Discover and inventory all cryptographic assets in your codebase