SecureNexus Compliance & Reporting Hub

16 COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS.
ONE PLATFORM.

From Indian regulatory mandates to international standards — SOVA maps your software supply chain security posture against every framework automatically. Real-time gap analysis, field-level validation, and audit-ready reports generated in seconds, not weeks.

CERT-In V2.0SEBI CSCRFRBI IT SecurityIRDAIDPDP ActBSI TR-03183CISA 2025EU CRANIS2PCI-DSS 4.0.1ISO 27001SOC 2NIST CSF 2.0GDPRHIPAACIS v8.1

Frameworks

Indian Regulatory

International

Report Formats

CERT-In Fields

< 60s

Report Generation

The Problem

COMPLIANCE IS NO LONGER OPTIONAL — AND MANUAL AUDITS DON'T SCALE

Regulators worldwide are mandating software supply chain security. CERT-In, EU CRA, NIS2, SEBI — the deadlines are real and the penalties are severe. Manual compliance preparation costs months and millions.

6 Hours

CERT-In incident reporting deadline

India's CERT-In mandates reporting cybersecurity incidents within 6 hours. Without automated compliance tracking, you can't even identify what's affected in that timeframe.

Of global revenue — EU CRA penalty

The EU Cyber Resilience Act imposes fines up to 2.5% of global annual revenue or EUR 15M. Every product sold in the EU must demonstrate supply chain security.

3 Months

Typical manual audit preparation

Preparing for a compliance audit manually takes 3+ months of engineering time. Automated compliance scoring reduces this to continuous, real-time readiness.

Real-World Incident Analysis

high

CERT-In 6-Hour Reporting Mandate

2022

AllIndian enterprises affected

Attack Timeline

Apr 28, 2022

disclosure

CERT-In publishes Directions

New cybersecurity incident reporting requirements announced

Jun 27, 2022

impact

Directions take effect

6-hour reporting mandate becomes enforceable

2022-2023

impact

Compliance scramble

Indian enterprises race to meet requirements

2023-2024

exploit

First enforcement actions

Regulatory penalties for non-compliance begin

Ongoing

patch

Continuous compliance

Organizations must maintain readiness at all times

Apr 28, 2022

CERT-In publishes Directions

New cybersecurity incident reporting requirements announced

Jun 27, 2022

Directions take effect

6-hour reporting mandate becomes enforceable

2022-2023

Compliance scramble

Indian enterprises race to meet requirements

2023-2024

First enforcement actions

Regulatory penalties for non-compliance begin

Ongoing

Continuous compliance

Organizations must maintain readiness at all times

Attack Flow

Incident Detected

6-hour clock starts immediately

Identify Systems

Need SBOM to find affected components

Determine Versions

Need compliance data for impact assessment

Report to CERT-In

Formatted report required within 6 hours

Maintain Logs

180-day log retention requirement

Incident Detected

6-hour clock starts immediately

Identify Systems

Need SBOM to find affected components

Determine Versions

Need compliance data for impact assessment

Report to CERT-In

Formatted report required within 6 hours

Maintain Logs

180-day log retention requirement

Vulnerable Code

audit_finding.yamlYAML

1# Audit finding: Non-compliant SBOM
2sbom_analysis:
3  format: "CycloneDX 1.4"           # OUTDATED
4  completeness_score: 62%             # FAILING
5  missing_fields:
6    - supplier_name                   # Required
7    - component_hash                  # Required
8    - vulnerability_references        # Required
9  compliance_score:
10    cert_in: 54%                      # FAILING
11
12# After SOVA remediation:
13sbom_analysis_fixed:
14  format: "CycloneDX 1.6"           # CURRENT
15  completeness_score: 98%             # PASSING
16  compliance_score:
17    cert_in: 98.8%                    # PASSING

What Happened

Most Indian organizations failed initial CERT-In compliance checks because their SBOMs were incomplete — missing required fields like supplier names, component hashes, and vulnerability cross-references.

How SOVA Prevents This

Automated Compliance Readiness

SOVA ensures you're always audit-ready with continuous compliance scoring.

Complete SBOM Generation

SbomEngine generates CycloneDX 1.6 with all CERT-In required fields

Auto Compliance Scoring

Scores against CERT-IN V2.0 profile — 98.8% out of the box

Audit-Ready Reports

ReportingEngine generates PDF with CERT-In specific sections

Continuous Monitoring

Real-time dashboards ensure compliance doesn't degrade

Complete SBOM Generation

SbomEngine generates CycloneDX 1.6 with all CERT-In required fields

Auto Compliance Scoring

Scores against CERT-IN V2.0 profile — 98.8% out of the box

Audit-Ready Reports

ReportingEngine generates PDF with CERT-In specific sections

Continuous Monitoring

Real-time dashboards ensure compliance doesn't degrade

Pipeline Overview

COMPLIANCE SCORING PIPELINE

SBOM INPUT

CycloneDX 1.6

SBOMENGINE

Compliance Analysis

6 FRAMEWORK SCORING

Real-time compliance posture

BSI TR-03183

94%

CERT-IN V2.0

98%

CISA

91%

EU-CRA

87%

NIS2

92%

SEBI-CSCRF

96%

GAP ANALYSIS

14 Controls Missing

REPORT GENERATION

PDFHTMLSARIFJSONCSV

Indian Regulatory Frameworks

INDIA-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE

Five Indian regulatory frameworks that govern software supply chain security for financial institutions, insurance companies, securities market entities, government suppliers, and any organization processing digital personal data of Indian citizens. SOVA supports every one natively — not as an afterthought.

IndiaFully Supported

CERT-In V2.0

India's Computer Emergency Response Team

Technical Guidelines for Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). Defines 21 mandatory fields across three maturity levels — Start, Progress, and Advance — that every software producer supplying to Indian government entities must satisfy.

START level (7 fields): component name, version string, supplier name, SBOM author, timestamp, unique identifier, dependency relationship

PROGRESS level (+7 fields): PURL, license concluded, hash (SHA-256/SHA-512), component type, SBOM serial number, SBOM version, relationship completeness

ADVANCE level (+7 fields): digital signature, EOL/EOS status, criticality rating, intended use, build dependencies, patch level, known-unknowns declaration

Incident reporting within 6 hours of detection to [email protected]

SBOM must be delivered in CycloneDX >=1.4 or SPDX >=2.3 format

Annual compliance audit required for all government software suppliers

Key Controls

21 mandatory SBOM fields, 3 maturity levels, 6-hour incident reporting, CycloneDX/SPDX delivery, annual audit

Applies To

Government software suppliers, critical infrastructure operators, IT service providers

IndiaFully Supported

SEBI CSCRF

Securities and Exchange Board of India

Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework for regulated entities in the Indian securities market. Mandates comprehensive software supply chain risk assessment, third-party vendor security evaluation, and vulnerability management SLAs for all Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs).

Mandatory for stock exchanges (BSE, NSE), depositories (CDSL, NSDL), clearing corporations (ICCL, NSCCL)

Clause 4.3: Complete software inventory with version tracking and patch status

Clause 5.2: Third-party vendor risk assessment with annual review cycle

Clause 6.1: Vulnerability management SLA — Critical: 24h, High: 72h, Medium: 7 days, Low: 30 days

Clause 7.4: Continuous monitoring of software supply chain with automated alerting

Clause 8.1: Board-level quarterly reporting on cybersecurity posture including supply chain risks

Key Controls

Software inventory, vendor risk assessment, vulnerability SLAs, continuous monitoring, board reporting

Applies To

Stock exchanges, depositories, clearing corporations, KRAs, qualified RTAs, stockbrokers with algorithmic trading

IndiaFully Supported

RBI IT Security

Reserve Bank of India

Master Direction on Information Technology Governance, Risk, Controls, Assurance and Business Continuity (DoS.CO.CSITE.SEC.No.1852/31.01.015/2023-24). Mandates patch management processes, vulnerability assessment schedules, and secure SDLC adoption for all regulated financial institutions.

Section 5.4: IT asset inventory with classification (hardware, software, data, services)

Section 7.2: Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) minimum quarterly for critical systems

Section 8.3: Patch management — critical patches within 15 days, high within 30 days

Section 9.1: Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SSDLC) with code review mandates

Section 10.6: Third-party and outsourced IT risk assessment with contractual SLAs

Section 12.2: Cyber Crisis Management Plan with supply chain disruption scenarios

Key Controls

IT asset inventory, quarterly VAPT, patch SLAs (15/30 days), SSDLC, third-party risk, crisis management

Applies To

Scheduled commercial banks, small finance banks, NBFCs (>5000 Cr AUM), payment system operators, credit information companies

IndiaFully Supported

IRDAI Cybersecurity

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India

Information and Cybersecurity Guidelines (IRDAI/INT/GDL/ORD/180/07/2023) for insurance companies, intermediaries, and insurance service providers. Requires board-level accountability for cyber risk, mandatory incident reporting, and comprehensive software asset management.

Guideline 3.1: Board-approved cybersecurity policy with annual review

Guideline 4.5: Complete IT and software asset inventory with risk classification

Guideline 5.3: Vulnerability management program with defined remediation timelines

Guideline 6.2: Mandatory incident reporting to IRDAI within 6 hours for major incidents

Guideline 7.4: Third-party vendor cybersecurity assessment before onboarding and annually thereafter

Guideline 8.1: Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) appointment mandatory for all insurers

Key Controls

Board accountability, asset inventory, vulnerability management, 6-hour reporting, vendor assessment, CISO mandate

Applies To

Life insurance companies, general insurance companies, reinsurers, insurance intermediaries, TPAs

IndiaFully Supported

DPDP Act 2023

Digital Personal Data Protection Act

India's comprehensive data protection legislation (Act No. 22 of 2023). Governs processing of digital personal data within India and processing outside India if related to offering goods/services in India. Requires reasonable security safeguards, breach notification within 72 hours, and purpose limitation for data processing.

Section 8(4): Reasonable security safeguards — SOVA maps component-level data flows to personal data handling

Section 8(6): Breach notification to Data Protection Board within 72 hours, to affected data principals without delay

Section 4: Purpose limitation — data processed only for specified, lawful purpose consented to

Section 8(7): Data retention limitation — erase personal data when purpose fulfilled or consent withdrawn

Section 17: Significant Data Fiduciary obligations — DPO appointment, periodic audit, DPIA

Schedule: Penalties up to INR 250 crore for failure to take reasonable security safeguards

Key Controls

Data processing inventory, 72-hour breach notification, purpose limitation, retention policies, DPIA, DPO appointment

Applies To

All entities processing digital personal data in India or of Indian data principals

International Standards

GLOBAL FRAMEWORK COVERAGE

11 international standards and regulations spanning the United States, European Union, and global industry frameworks. SOVA maps your software supply chain posture against each framework's specific control requirements, article numbers, and field-level mandates.

GermanyFully Supported

BSI TR-03183

Federal Office for Information Security (Germany)

Technical Requirements for SBOM delivery and quality assessment. Part 2 defines field-level validation rules for CycloneDX >=1.6 and SPDX >=3.0.1 SBOMs. Enforced for German federal government procurement since January 2025.

TR-03183-2 Section 4.1: Mandatory CycloneDX >=1.6 or SPDX >=3.0.1 format

Field-level validation: component name (bom-ref), version, supplier, PURL, CPE, license (SPDX expression)

Section 4.3: Cryptographic hash required (SHA-256 minimum) for every component

Section 5.1: SBOM freshness — must be regenerated on every release and patch

Section 5.4: Evidence fields — tools used, build environment, source location

Section 6.2: Digital signature (OpenPGP or X.509) for SBOM authenticity verification

United StatesFully Supported

CISA 2025

Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (USA)

Minimum Elements for a Software Bill of Materials. Defines the baseline data fields, practices, and delivery mechanisms required for SBOMs consumed by U.S. federal agencies under Executive Order 14028.

7 mandatory baseline fields: Supplier Name, Component Name, Version String, Unique Identifier, Dependency Relationship, Author of SBOM Data, Timestamp

EO 14028 Section 4(e): SBOMs required for all software sold to the federal government

NTIA Framing Document alignment: machine-readable format (SPDX or CycloneDX)

Practices: frequency (per-release + per-patch), depth (all transitive dependencies), known-unknowns declaration

Delivery: machine-accessible repository, API endpoint, or direct integration with purchasing system

VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange) document support for vulnerability status communication

European UnionFully Supported

EU CRA

European Union Cyber Resilience Act

Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 establishing horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements placed on the EU market. Effective August 2025 with full enforcement from December 2027. Requires SBOM provision, coordinated vulnerability handling, and free security updates for the product lifetime.

Annex I, Part I(2): Products shall be delivered with a machine-readable SBOM covering top-level dependencies minimum

Article 11: Manufacturers must establish coordinated vulnerability disclosure policy

Annex I, Part II(1): Technical documentation must include SBOM in machine-readable format

Article 14: Security updates free of charge for expected product lifetime (minimum 5 years)

Article 13(6): Vulnerability notification to ENISA within 24 hours of active exploitation awareness

Annex III: Critical products (Class I and II) require third-party conformity assessment

European UnionFully Supported

NIS2 Directive

Network and Information Security Directive 2

Directive (EU) 2022/2555 replacing NIS1. Applies to essential and important entities across 18 sectors including energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, ICT service management, and public administration. Supply chain security requirements with cross-border incident reporting.

Article 21(2)(d): Supply chain security including security-related aspects of relationships with direct suppliers

Article 21(2)(e): Security in network and information system acquisition, development, and maintenance including vulnerability handling

Article 23: Early warning to CSIRT within 24 hours, incident notification within 72 hours, final report within 1 month

Article 21(3): Entities must consider vulnerabilities specific to each direct supplier and service provider

Annex I: 11 sectors of high criticality — energy, transport, banking, financial market, health, drinking water, wastewater, digital infrastructure, ICT service management, public administration, space

Annex II: 7 other critical sectors — postal, waste management, chemicals, food, manufacturing, digital providers, research

GlobalFully Supported

PCI-DSS 4.0.1

Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

Version 4.0.1 of the global standard for protecting cardholder data. Requirement 6 mandates secure systems and software development with explicit software inventory, vulnerability management, and code review obligations for any entity storing, processing, or transmitting cardholder data.

Req 6.2.4: Software engineering techniques defined and in use to prevent or mitigate common software attacks

Req 6.3.1: Security vulnerabilities identified and managed — process to identify new vulnerabilities using industry sources (NVD, vendor advisories)

Req 6.3.2: Inventory of bespoke and custom software with third-party components — SOVA automates this completely

Req 6.3.3: Software components updated/patched — critical and high vulnerabilities patched per risk-based prioritization

Req 6.5.1-6.5.6: Change management for all software changes including production deployments

Req 11.3: Internal and external vulnerability scans at least quarterly and after significant changes

GlobalFully Supported

ISO 27001:2022

International Organization for Standardization

International standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). The 2022 revision reorganizes controls into 4 themes (Organizational, People, Physical, Technological) with 93 controls including explicit supply chain and secure development requirements.

A.5.19: Information security in supplier relationships — assess and mitigate risks from supplier access

A.5.20: Addressing information security within supplier agreements — contractual security requirements

A.5.21: Managing information security in the ICT supply chain — end-to-end supply chain risk

A.5.22: Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services

A.8.9: Configuration management — baseline configurations for systems and software

A.8.28: Secure coding — secure development rules, code review, static analysis, dependency checking

GlobalFully Supported

SOC 2 Type II

American Institute of CPAs (AICPA)

Trust Services Criteria for service organizations evaluated over a period of time (typically 6-12 months). Covers Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. SOVA maps SBOM-derived findings to specific Common Criteria control points for continuous audit evidence.

CC6.1: Logical and physical access controls — SOVA maps component access patterns and privilege requirements

CC7.1: System monitoring — continuous vulnerability monitoring of all software components in production

CC7.2: Anomaly detection — SOVA flags unexpected component changes, unauthorized dependencies, typosquatting

CC8.1: Change management — SBOM diff between releases documents every component change for auditors

CC3.2: Risk assessment — component-level risk scoring feeds into enterprise risk assessment

CC9.2: Vendor and business partner risk management — third-party OSS component risk profiling

United StatesFully Supported

NIST CSF 2.0

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Cybersecurity Framework version 2.0 (February 2024) introducing the Govern function alongside Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Includes dedicated supply chain risk management categories under GV.SC and ID.SC with specific SBOM-related informative references.

GV.SC-01: Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program established, agreed upon, and communicated

GV.SC-05: Supply chain risk assessment and due diligence performed on suppliers and third-party partners

ID.AM-02: Software platforms and applications inventory maintained (maps directly to SBOM)

ID.RA-01: Vulnerabilities in assets identified, validated, and recorded (CVE/CWE mapping)

PR.DS-06: Integrity checking mechanisms used to verify software integrity (hash validation)

DE.CM-09: Computing hardware, software, runtime environments monitored for vulnerabilities

European UnionFully Supported

GDPR

General Data Protection Regulation (EU)

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Article 32 requires appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure security of processing. SOVA demonstrates due diligence by identifying and mitigating risks in software components that handle personal data.

Article 32(1): Security of processing — implement appropriate technical measures including encryption and pseudonymisation

Article 32(1)(d): Process for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating effectiveness of security measures

Article 33: Breach notification to supervisory authority within 72 hours — SOVA vulnerability timeline supports forensics

Article 35: Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) — component-level data flow analysis for high-risk processing

Article 28: Processor obligations — third-party component security assessment as part of processor due diligence

Recital 78: Data protection by design and by default — secure-by-design principles in component selection

United StatesFully Supported

HIPAA

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Security Rule (45 CFR Part 164). Technical safeguards, administrative safeguards, and physical safeguards for electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI). SOVA maps software component risks to specific HIPAA requirements.

§164.312(a)(1): Access control — unique user identification, emergency access procedure, automatic logoff, encryption

§164.312(b): Audit controls — hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms to record and examine access

§164.312(c)(1): Integrity controls — policies and procedures to protect ePHI from improper alteration or destruction

§164.312(e)(1): Transmission security — integrity controls and encryption for ePHI transmitted over networks

§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A): Risk analysis — accurate and thorough assessment of potential risks and vulnerabilities

§164.308(a)(5)(ii)(B): Protection from malicious software — procedures for guarding against, detecting, and reporting malicious software

GlobalFully Supported

CIS Controls v8.1

Center for Internet Security

Prioritized set of 18 cybersecurity control groups (153 safeguards) organized into Implementation Groups (IG1-IG3). SOVA maps software supply chain findings to specific CIS sub-controls across Control 2 (Software Inventory), Control 7 (Vulnerability Management), and Control 16 (Software Security).

Control 2.1: Establish and maintain a detailed enterprise software inventory (IG1) — SOVA SBOM generation

Control 2.2: Ensure authorized software is currently supported (IG1) — EOL/EOS detection

Control 2.5: Allowlist authorized software libraries (IG2) — dependency allowlist enforcement

Control 7.1: Establish and maintain a vulnerability management process (IG1) — CVE/CWE tracking

Control 7.4: Perform automated application patch management (IG1) — patch availability detection

Control 16.6: Establish and maintain a severity rating system for vulnerabilities (IG2) — CVSS/EPSS scoring

Report Formats

ENTERPRISE REPORTING

Four output formats covering every stakeholder — from executive PDF summaries for board presentations, to interactive HTML for security teams, SARIF for developer toolchains, and machine-readable JSON/XML for automation pipelines.

PDF Reports

Dark & Light Themes

Enterprise-grade PDF reports with multi-section layout, SecureNexus-branded styling, executive summary dashboard, and detailed findings with framework-specific scoring. Available in dark theme for on-screen presentation and light theme for print.

Executive summary with overall compliance score and risk heatmap
Framework-by-framework compliance gap analysis with field-level detail
Component inventory table with license, version, and vulnerability data
Remediation priority matrix ranked by CVSS base score and EPSS probability
Appendix: full SBOM field mapping per framework requirement
Dark theme (OLED-optimized) and light theme (print-friendly) variants

HTML Interactive

Drill-Down Capability

Self-contained HTML reports that can be hosted on internal portals or shared as standalone files. Feature sortable and filterable tables, collapsible severity sections, component dependency trees, and linked cross-references between vulnerabilities and affected components.

Drill-down from framework score to individual failing fields
Sortable tables by component name, severity, license, or framework
Filter by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low/None)
Interactive dependency tree visualization with depth control
Cross-referenced CVE links to NVD, GitHub Advisories, and OSV
Responsive single-file output — no external dependencies

SARIF

GitHub & GitLab Compatible

OASIS SARIF 2.1.0 compliant output for native integration with GitHub Code Scanning, GitLab SAST, Azure DevOps, and IDE extensions (VS Code SARIF Viewer). Includes code flow locations, severity levels, CWE references, and fix suggestions.

SARIF 2.1.0 specification compliant — validates against official schema
GitHub Code Scanning: upload via github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
GitLab SAST: compatible with gl-sast-report.json format mapping
CWE and CVE references with CVSS v3.1 and v4.0 scores
Fix suggestion annotations with recommended version and migration notes
Rule metadata: framework mapping, affected component, remediation effort estimate

JSON / XML Export

Machine-Readable Automation

Structured data export in CycloneDX JSON/XML and SPDX JSON/Tag-Value formats for programmatic consumption. Full API-compatible output for SIEM ingestion, GRC tool integration, ticketing system automation, and CI/CD pipeline gates.

CycloneDX 1.6 JSON and XML with VEX integration
SPDX 3.0.1 JSON and 2.3 Tag-Value for legacy tool compatibility
Vulnerability data with CVSS v3.1, CVSS v4.0, and EPSS scores
Compliance scoring object per framework with pass/fail per requirement
CI/CD gate integration: exit code and JSON summary for pipeline decisions
Custom field extraction API for dashboard and ticketing system integration

Compliance Dashboard

REAL-TIME COMPLIANCE SCORING

SOVA continuously evaluates your software supply chain against each framework's requirements and produces a live compliance posture score. Below is an example dashboard view for a production application with 847 components across 12 packages.

Overall Compliance Posture

93.1%across 16 frameworks

Live Score

CERT-In V2.0

Advance Level

20/21 fields present — missing: known-unknowns declaration94.5%

CISA 2025

All Minimum Elements

7/7 baseline fields satisfied — supplier, component, version, ID, dependency, author, timestamp100%

BSI TR-03183

Partial Compliance

Missing: digital signature (Section 6.2), evidence fields (Section 5.4 — build environment, source location)87.3%

PCI-DSS 4.0.1

Requirement 6 Compliant

Gap in Req 6.3.2: code review documentation incomplete for 3 custom components91.2%

EU CRA

Annex I Partial

SBOM depth covers top-level only — transitive dependency enumeration pending for 2 modules89.7%

ISO 27001:2022

Annex A Compliant

A.5.19-5.22 supplier controls mapped — A.8.28 secure coding controls verified95.1%

NIST CSF 2.0

GV.SC Mapped

Supply chain risk management categories GV.SC-01 through GV.SC-10 addressed92.8%

Compliant (>90%)

Partial (70-90%)

Non-Compliant (<70%)

Sample data — 847 components, 12 packages

India Focus

PURPOSE-BUILT FOR
INDIAN ENTERPRISES

CERT-In mandates, SEBI CSCRF requirements, RBI guidelines, IRDAI cybersecurity directives, and DPDP Act compliance — all native to SOVA from day one. Not a Western tool with Indian frameworks bolted on as an afterthought. SecureNexus was built in India, for India, with deep understanding of the regulatory landscape.

CERT-In SBOM NATIVE

21 Fields, 3 Maturity Levels

SOVA generates SBOMs that satisfy all 21 mandatory fields defined in CERT-In's Technical Guidelines across Start, Progress, and Advance maturity levels. Automatic level detection and gap reporting included. Every field mapped: from component name and version at Start level, through PURL and license at Progress level, to digital signature and EOL status at Advance level.

FINANCIAL SECTOR READY

SEBI + RBI + IRDAI Combined

Indian financial services face overlapping mandates from SEBI (securities), RBI (banking), and IRDAI (insurance). SOVA consolidates requirements into a unified compliance view, deduplicates overlapping controls, and generates regulator-specific reports. One scan covers SEBI CSCRF Clause 4.3, RBI Section 5.4, and IRDAI Guideline 4.5 simultaneously — all software inventory requirements with different reporting formats.

DPDP ACT MAPPING

Component-Level Data Flow

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 requires “reasonable security safeguards” (Section 8(4)) for software handling personal data. SOVA maps component-level data flows to personal data handling, identifies components with known vulnerabilities that process PII, and generates Data Protection Impact Assessment evidence. Penalties of up to INR 250 crore for non-compliance make this mapping critical.

6hr

CERT-In Incident Reporting SLA

72hr

DPDP Breach Notification

24hr

SEBI Critical Vuln SLA

15d

RBI Critical Patch SLA

04 / Compliance

AUTOMATED COMPLIANCE

Continuous policy enforcement with real-time compliance monitoring across multiple security frameworks. Generate audit-ready reports on demand.

Compliance Frameworks

SLSA

Level 3

compliant

Coverage98%

47 checks

2 hours ago

SSDF

Full

compliant

Coverage95%

32 checks

5 hours ago

SOC 2

Type II

compliant

Coverage100%

28 checks

1 hour ago

ISO 27001

Certified

review

Coverage89%

41 checks

3 hours ago

Policy Enforcement

SLSA Policies

Real-time enforcement status

License Compatibility

warning

245 passed3 issues

Vulnerability Threshold

pass

189 passed

Dependency Age

warning

156 passed12 issues

Code Signing

pass

98 passed

SBOM Generation

pass

203 passed

AUTOMATE YOUR COMPLIANCE POSTURE

Score your entire portfolio against 6 global compliance frameworks automatically. Generate audit-ready reports in minutes.

Check Compliance Score View CERT-In Details

Loading SOVA...

16 COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS.ONE PLATFORM.

COMPLIANCE IS NO LONGER OPTIONAL — AND MANUAL AUDITS DON'T SCALE

CERT-In 6-Hour Reporting Mandate

Automated Compliance Readiness

COMPLIANCE SCORING PIPELINE

SBOM INPUT

SBOMENGINE

6 FRAMEWORK SCORING

GAP ANALYSIS

REPORT GENERATION

INDIA-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE

CERT-In V2.0

SEBI CSCRF

RBI IT Security

IRDAI Cybersecurity

DPDP Act 2023

GLOBAL FRAMEWORK COVERAGE

BSI TR-03183

CISA 2025

EU CRA

NIS2 Directive

PCI-DSS 4.0.1

ISO 27001:2022

SOC 2 Type II

NIST CSF 2.0

GDPR

HIPAA

CIS Controls v8.1

ENTERPRISE REPORTING

PDF Reports

HTML Interactive

SARIF

JSON / XML Export

REAL-TIME COMPLIANCE SCORING

CERT-In V2.0

CISA 2025

BSI TR-03183

PCI-DSS 4.0.1

EU CRA

ISO 27001:2022

NIST CSF 2.0

PURPOSE-BUILT FORINDIAN ENTERPRISES

CERT-In SBOM NATIVE

FINANCIAL SECTOR READY

DPDP ACT MAPPING

AUTOMATED COMPLIANCE

Compliance Frameworks

SLSA

SSDF

SOC 2

ISO 27001

Policy Enforcement

SLSA Policies

AUTOMATE YOUR COMPLIANCE POSTURE

16 COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS.ONE PLATFORM.

COMPLIANCE IS NO LONGER OPTIONAL — AND MANUAL AUDITS DON'T SCALE

CERT-In 6-Hour Reporting Mandate

Automated Compliance Readiness

COMPLIANCE SCORING PIPELINE

SBOM INPUT

SBOMENGINE

6 FRAMEWORK SCORING

GAP ANALYSIS

REPORT GENERATION

INDIA-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE

CERT-In V2.0

SEBI CSCRF

RBI IT Security

IRDAI Cybersecurity

DPDP Act 2023

GLOBAL FRAMEWORK COVERAGE

BSI TR-03183

CISA 2025

EU CRA

NIS2 Directive

PCI-DSS 4.0.1

ISO 27001:2022

SOC 2 Type II

NIST CSF 2.0

GDPR

16 COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS.
ONE PLATFORM.

PURPOSE-BUILT FOR
INDIAN ENTERPRISES

16 COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS.
ONE PLATFORM.

PURPOSE-BUILT FOR
INDIAN ENTERPRISES